You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social support of people with HIV/AIDS: the Social Determinants of Health Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0346 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vanessa da Frota Santos, Samyla Citó Pedrosa, Priscila de Souza Aquino, Ivana Cristina Vieira de Lima, Gilmara Holanda da Cunha, Marli Teresinha Gimeniz Galvão |
| Abstract |
To analyze the social support of people with HIV/AIDS from the perspective of the Social Determinants of Health Model. This was a cross-sectional study conducted in 2015 in an infectious disease outpatient clinic. The sample was made up of 116 people with HIV/AIDS. The data was collected through interviews, using a sociodemographic form and a social support scale. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, and Student's t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests were performed to determine the association between social support and the social determinants of health. Total social support was satisfactory, emotional support was influenced by smoking (p=0.0432) and instrumental support, by the number of people in the household (p=0.0003). The main source of instrumental and emotional support was relatives living outside the household, corresponding to 66.7% and 56.1%, respectively. It was found that smokers havelower emotional support and people living alone received less instrumental support. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 22% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,242,285
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#250
of 736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,767
of 449,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#19
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 736 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.