You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Contesting the evidence for non-adaptive plasticity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature25496 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
François Mallard, Ana Marija Jakšić, Christian Schlötterer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 26% |
| France | 2 | 9% |
| Austria | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
| Scientists | 10 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,912,162
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#49,362
of 98,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,692
of 345,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#781
of 914 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 914 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.