↓ Skip to main content

Calibrating whole building energy models: Detailed case study using hourly measured data

Overview of attention for article published in Energy & Buildings, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
357 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Calibrating whole building energy models: Detailed case study using hourly measured data
Published in
Energy & Buildings, December 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.09.039
Authors

Paul Raftery, Marcus Keane, Andrea Costa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 339 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 107 30%
Student > Master 65 18%
Researcher 44 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Student > Bachelor 15 4%
Other 55 15%
Unknown 53 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 198 55%
Energy 29 8%
Environmental Science 14 4%
Design 9 3%
Computer Science 8 2%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 75 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,544,090
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Energy & Buildings
#725
of 2,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,175
of 246,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Energy & Buildings
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.