↓ Skip to main content

Facial Disfigurement and Identity: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Facial Transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in AMA Journal of Ethics, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Facial Disfigurement and Identity: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Facial Transplantation
Published in
AMA Journal of Ethics, April 2018
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.4.peer1-1804
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Facial disfigurement can significantly affect personal identity and access to social roles. Although conventional reconstruction can have positive effects with respect to identity, these procedures are often inadequate for more severe facial defects. In these cases, facial transplantation (FT) offers patients a viable reconstructive option. However, FT's effect on personal identity has been less well examined, and ethical questions remain regarding the psychosocial ramifications of the procedure. This article reviews the literature on the different roles of the face as well as psychological and social effects of facial disfigurement. The effects of facial reconstruction on personal identity are also reviewed with an emphasis on orthognathic, cleft, and head and neck surgery. Finally, FT is considered in this context, and future directions for research are explored.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Researcher 4 14%
Other 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 34%
Psychology 5 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 28%