↓ Skip to main content

CpG Islands

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'CpG Islands'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 CpG Islands: A Historical Perspective
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Biochemical Identification of Nonmethylated DNA by BioCAP-Seq
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Prediction of CpG Islands as an Intrinsic Clustering Property Found in Many Eukaryotic DNA Sequences and Its Relation to DNA Methylation
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 CpG Islands in Cancer: Heads, Tails, and Sides
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Infinium DNA Methylation Microarrays on Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Samples
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 The Use of Methylation-Sensitive Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification for Quantification of Imprinted Methylation
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 The Pancancer DNA Methylation Trackhub: A Window to The Cancer Genome Atlas Epigenomics Data
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Methylation-Sensitive Amplification Length Polymorphism (MS-AFLP) Microarrays for Epigenetic Analysis of Human Genomes
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Genome-Wide Profiling of DNA Methyltransferases in Mammalian Cells
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Experimental Design and Bioinformatic Analysis of DNA Methylation Data
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin (ATAC-Seq) to Chart the Open Chromatin Landscape of Human Pancreatic Islets
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Defining Regulatory Elements in the Human Genome Using Nucleosome Occupancy and Methylome Sequencing (NOMe-Seq)
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Genome-Wide Mapping of Protein–DNA Interactions on Nascent Chromatin
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Analysis of Chromatin Interactions Mediated by Specific Architectural Proteins in Drosophila Cells
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 High-Throughput Single-Cell RNA Sequencing and Data Analysis
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Functional Insulator Scanning of CpG Islands to Identify Regulatory Regions of Promoters Using CRISPR
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 An Application-Directed, Versatile DNA FISH Platform for Research and Diagnostics
Attention for Chapter 6: The Use of Methylation-Sensitive Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification for Quantification of Imprinted Methylation
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Use of Methylation-Sensitive Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification for Quantification of Imprinted Methylation
Chapter number 6
Book title
CpG Islands
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7768-0_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7767-3, 978-1-4939-7768-0
Authors

Ana Monteagudo-Sánchez, Intza Garin, Guiomar Perez de Nanclares, David Monk

Abstract

Imprinting disorders are a group of congenital diseases that can result from multiple mechanisms affecting imprinted gene dosage including cytogenetic aberration and epigenetic anomalies. Quantification of CpG methylation and correct copy-number calling is required for molecular diagnosis. Methylation-sensitive multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA) is a multiplex method that accurately measures both parameters in a single assay. This technique relies upon the ligation of MLPA probe oligonucleotides and digestion of the genomic DNA-probe hybrid complexes with the Hha1 methylation-sensitive restriction endonuclease prior to fluorescent PCR amplification with a single primer pair. Since each targeted probe contains stuffer sequence of varying length, each interrogated position is visualized as an amplicon of different size upon capillary electrophoresis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 56%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#17,937,475
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,298
of 13,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,429
of 442,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#869
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.