↓ Skip to main content

‐Non‐pharmacological interventions for wandering of people with dementia in the domestic setting

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
305 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
‐Non‐pharmacological interventions for wandering of people with dementia in the domestic setting
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005994.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dymphna Hermans, U Hla Htay, Susanna J Cooley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 297 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 17%
Researcher 42 14%
Student > Bachelor 39 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 9%
Other 16 5%
Other 50 16%
Unknown 81 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 12%
Psychology 32 10%
Social Sciences 19 6%
Computer Science 9 3%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 88 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,242
of 173,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.