↓ Skip to main content

Social Media for Global Education: Pearls and Pitfalls of Using Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Radiology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social Media for Global Education: Pearls and Pitfalls of Using Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram
Published in
Journal of the American College of Radiology, October 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.01.039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Black Thomas, Pamela T. Johnson, Elliot K. Fishman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Computer Science 3 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 15 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,834,116
of 17,180,396 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Radiology
#646
of 2,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,061
of 286,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Radiology
#42
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,180,396 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.