↓ Skip to main content

The development of a new corporate specific health risk measurement instrument, and its use in investigating the relationship between health and well-being and employee productivity

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The development of a new corporate specific health risk measurement instrument, and its use in investigating the relationship between health and well-being and employee productivity
Published in
Environmental Health, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-4-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter R Mills

Abstract

There is a growing body of evidence linking health and well-being to key business issues. Despite this, corporate uptake of workplace health promotion programmes has been slow outside the USA. One possible reason for this is the lack of a generally available health risk measure that is quick and easy to administer and produces data that is rich enough to inform and direct subsequent employee health promotional interventions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 6 9%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 15%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Sports and Recreations 5 7%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 10 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,163,507
of 12,487,163 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#475
of 1,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,718
of 271,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,487,163 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them