You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The development of a new corporate specific health risk measurement instrument, and its use in investigating the relationship between health and well-being and employee productivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-4-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter R Mills |
| Abstract |
There is a growing body of evidence linking health and well-being to key business issues. Despite this, corporate uptake of workplace health promotion programmes has been slow outside the USA. One possible reason for this is the lack of a generally available health risk measure that is quick and easy to administer and produces data that is rich enough to inform and direct subsequent employee health promotional interventions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,413,935
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#734
of 1,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,592
of 141,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.