↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of intensive multifactorial treatment compared with routine care for individuals with screen-detected Type 2 diabetes: analysis of the ADDITION-UK cluster-randomized controlled…

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetic Medicine, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-effectiveness of intensive multifactorial treatment compared with routine care for individuals with screen-detected Type 2 diabetes: analysis of the ADDITION-UK cluster-randomized controlled trial
Published in
Diabetic Medicine, April 2015
DOI 10.1111/dme.12711
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Tao, E. C. F. Wilson, N. J. Wareham, A. Sandbaek, G. E. H. M. Rutten, T. Lauritzen, K. Khunti, M. J. Davies, K. Borch-Johnsen, S. J. Griffin, R. K. Simmons

Abstract

To examine the short- and long-term cost-effectiveness of intensive multifactorial treatment compared with routine care among people with screen-detected Type 2 diabetes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 88 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 22%
Unspecified 18 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 37%
Unspecified 21 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Psychology 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 18 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2015.
All research outputs
#7,316,608
of 12,189,428 outputs
Outputs from Diabetic Medicine
#1,614
of 2,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,409
of 275,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetic Medicine
#28
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,189,428 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.