↓ Skip to main content

Measles

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 10: Measles: old vaccines, new vaccines.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Measles: old vaccines, new vaccines.
Chapter number 10
Book title
Measles
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-70617-5_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-070616-8, 978-3-54-070617-5
Authors

Griffin DE, Pan CH, D. E. Griffin, C. -H. Pan, Griffin, D. E., Pan, C. -H.

Abstract

Isolation of measles virus in tissue culture by Enders and colleagues in the 1960s led to the development of the first measles vaccines. An inactivated vaccine provided only short-term protection and induced poor T cell responses and antibody that did not undergo affinity maturation. The response to this vaccine primed for atypical measles, a more severe form of measles, and was withdrawn. A live attenuated virus vaccine has been highly successful in protection from measles and in elimination of endemic measles virus transmission with the use of two doses. This vaccine is administered by injection between 9 and 15 months of age. Measles control would be facilitated if infants could be immunized at a younger age, if the vaccine were thermostable, and if delivery did not require a needle and syringe. To these ends, new vaccines are under development using macaques as an animal model and various combinations of the H, F, and N viral proteins. Promising studies have been reported using DNA vaccines, subunit vaccines, and virus-vectored vaccines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 22%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,586,968
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#66
of 704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,943
of 189,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.