↓ Skip to main content


Overview of attention for article published in Retrovirology, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

1 patent


65 Dimensions

Readers on

39 Mendeley
2 CiteULike
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Published in
Retrovirology, January 2006
DOI 10.1186/1742-4690-3-52
Pubmed ID

Fedde Groot, Toni MM van Capel, Joost HN Schuitemaker, Ben Berkhout, Esther C de Jong

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 33%
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Master 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 23%
Computer Science 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2014.
All research outputs
of 12,472,057 outputs
Outputs from Retrovirology
of 715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 272,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Retrovirology
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,472,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them