↓ Skip to main content

Data analysis considerations for pesticides determined by National Water Quality Laboratory schedule 2437

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Data analysis considerations for pesticides determined by National Water Quality Laboratory schedule 2437
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2018
DOI 10.3133/sir20185007
Authors

Shoda, Megan E., Nowell, Lisa H., Stone, Wesley W., Sandstrom, Mark W., Bexfield, Laura M.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 50%
Chemistry 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2018.
All research outputs
#10,191,365
of 12,761,472 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#1,252
of 1,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,117
of 273,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#84
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,761,472 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.