You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advanced titania nanostructures and composites for lithium ion battery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-011-5974-x |
| Authors |
Xin Su, QingLiu Wu, Xin Zhan, Ji Wu, Suying Wei, Zhanhu Guo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 32% |
| Researcher | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 58 | 32% |
| Chemistry | 33 | 18% |
| Engineering | 23 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,315,928
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#96
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,908
of 132,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#1
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.