↓ Skip to main content

How to translate therapeutic recommendations in clinical practice guidelines into rules for critiquing physician prescriptions? Methods and application to five guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to translate therapeutic recommendations in clinical practice guidelines into rules for critiquing physician prescriptions? Methods and application to five guidelines
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, May 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-10-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Baptiste Lamy, Vahid Ebrahiminia, Christine Riou, Brigitte Seroussi, Jacques Bouaud, Christian Simon, Stéphane Dubois, Antoine Butti, Gérard Simon, Madeleine Favre, Hector Falcoff, Alain Venot

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
France 2 4%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 46 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Master 8 16%
Researcher 6 12%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 14 27%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 39%
Computer Science 10 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2015.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#504
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,066
of 107,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them