↓ Skip to main content

Noninvasive methods in evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: where do we stand now? An update

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
13 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Noninvasive methods in evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: where do we stand now? An update
Published in
Clinics, January 2010
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322010000200015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cansel Turkay, Benan Kasapoglu

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 95 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 22%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Researcher 12 12%
Professor 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 26 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,662,622
of 18,009,382 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#90
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,203
of 288,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,009,382 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them