The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Use and comparison of different internal ribosomal entry sites (IRES) in tricistronic retroviral vectors
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Biotechnology, July 2004
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6750-4-16 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Victorine Douin, Stephanie Bornes, Laurent Creancier, Philippe Rochaix, Gilles Favre, Anne-Catherine Prats, Bettina Couderc |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 3% |
Belgium | 2 | 2% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 99 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 25% |
Researcher | 20 | 19% |
Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Professor | 6 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 17% |
Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 48% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 15 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#285
of 982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,802
of 59,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them