You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of random forest and its Gini importance with standard chemometric methods for the feature selection and classification of spectral data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-10-213 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bjoern H Menze, B Michael Kelm, Ralf Masuch, Uwe Himmelreich, Peter Bachert, Wolfgang Petrich, Fred A Hamprecht |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 780 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 757 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 149 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 136 | 17% |
| Researcher | 93 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 5% |
| Other | 95 | 12% |
| Unknown | 208 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 113 | 14% |
| Engineering | 96 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 86 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 29 | 4% |
| Other | 175 | 22% |
| Unknown | 247 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,578,037
of 23,592,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#782
of 7,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,221
of 112,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#6
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,592,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.