↓ Skip to main content

TO TWEET OR NOT TO TWEET: RAPID GROWTH IN THE USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA AT MAJOR CARDIOVASCULAR MEETINGS

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
18 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TO TWEET OR NOT TO TWEET: RAPID GROWTH IN THE USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA AT MAJOR CARDIOVASCULAR MEETINGS
Published in
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), March 2018
DOI 10.1016/s0735-1097(18)33174-7
Authors

Michael Tanoue, Heajung Nguyen, Troy Sekimura, Dhananjay Chatterjee, William Suh, Janet Han

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2018.
All research outputs
#636,004
of 12,167,491 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#1,764
of 10,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,157
of 265,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#140
of 347 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,167,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 347 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.