You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
TO TWEET OR NOT TO TWEET: RAPID GROWTH IN THE USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA AT MAJOR CARDIOVASCULAR MEETINGS
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0735-1097(18)33174-7 |
Authors |
Michael Tanoue, Heajung Nguyen, Troy Sekimura, Dhananjay Chatterjee, William Suh, Janet Han |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 30% |
France | 2 | 10% |
Pakistan | 2 | 10% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Yemen | 1 | 5% |
Uruguay | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 45% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 30% |
Scientists | 3 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
Other | 1 | 25% |
Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 50% |
Computer Science | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,658,886
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#3,772
of 16,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,811
of 344,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#141
of 414 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 414 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.