You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Low affinity uniporter carrier proteins can increase net substrate uptake rate by reducing efflux
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-23528-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Evert Bosdriesz, Meike T. Wortel, Jurgen R. Haanstra, Marijke J. Wagner, Pilar de la Torre Cortés, Bas Teusink |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 4 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,506,353
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#35,684
of 142,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,757
of 346,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#917
of 3,476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.