You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
眠気予防薬の多量服用によるカフェイン中毒の2例
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.11240/jsem.17.711 |
Authors |
北村 淳, 宮部 浩道, 植西 憲達, 加納 秀記, 平川 昭彦, 原 克子, 小宮山 豊, 山中 克郎, 武山 直志 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 10 | 31% |
China | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 21 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,525,360
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#4
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,420
of 266,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them