You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolution of Darwin’s finches and their beaks revealed by genome sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature14181 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sangeet Lamichhaney, Jonas Berglund, Markus Sällman Almén, Khurram Maqbool, Manfred Grabherr, Alvaro Martinez-Barrio, Marta Promerová, Carl-Johan Rubin, Chao Wang, Neda Zamani, B. Rosemary Grant, Peter R. Grant, Matthew T. Webster, Leif Andersson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 307 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 80 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 32 | 10% |
| Canada | 15 | 5% |
| Spain | 9 | 3% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| Japan | 4 | 1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 34 | 11% |
| Unknown | 118 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 159 | 52% |
| Scientists | 128 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,737 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 39 | 2% |
| Germany | 9 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | <1% |
| Sweden | 7 | <1% |
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| Brazil | 6 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 24 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1625 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 419 | 24% |
| Researcher | 291 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 241 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 225 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 78 | 4% |
| Other | 248 | 14% |
| Unknown | 235 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 988 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 281 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 72 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | <1% |
| Other | 82 | 5% |
| Unknown | 276 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 652. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#33,744
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3,043
of 98,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290
of 369,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#45
of 929 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 929 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.