You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reduced contribution of thermally labile sugar lesions to DNA double strand break formation after exposure to heavy ions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-717x-8-77 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Satyendra K Singh, Alena Bencsik-Theilen, Emil Mladenov, Burkhard Jakob, Gisela Taucher-Scholz, George Iliakis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Bulgaria | 1 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Poland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 35% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2017.
All research outputs
#4,759,510
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#200
of 2,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,993
of 200,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#7
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,072 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.