↓ Skip to main content

Sirtuins

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Sirtuins'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Introduction: sirtuins in aging and diseases.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Sirtuins in Yeast: Phenotypes and Tools
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 C. elegans Sirtuins.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Genetic and Biochemical Tools for Investigating Sirtuin Function in Drosophila melanogaster.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Generating Mammalian sirtuin tools for protein-interaction analysis.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Mass spectrometry-based detection of protein acetylation.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 SILAC-Based Quantification of Sirt1-Responsive Lysine Acetylome.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Targeted Quantitation of Acetylated Lysine Peptides by Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Identification of deacetylase substrates with the biotin switch approach.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Assaying Chromatin Sirtuins
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Measurement of sirtuin enzyme activity using a substrate-agnostic fluorometric nicotinamide assay.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Detecting Sirtuin-Catalyzed Deacylation Reactions Using 32 P-Labeled NAD and Thin-Layer Chromatography
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Chemical Acetylation and Deacetylation
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Accurate Measurement of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NAD + ) with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 In Vivo Measurement of the Acetylation State of Sirtuin Substrates as a Proxy for Sirtuin Activity
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Oxygen flux analysis to understand the biological function of sirtuins.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 The Emerging Links Between Sirtuins and Autophagy
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Methods to Study the Role of Sirtuins in Genome Stability
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Circadian Measurements of Sirtuin Biology
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Utilizing Calorie Restriction to Evaluate the Role of Sirtuins in Healthspan and Lifespan of Mice
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Erratum: Sirtuins: Methods and Protocols
Attention for Chapter 3: C. elegans Sirtuins.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
C. elegans Sirtuins.
Chapter number 3
Book title
Sirtuins
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-637-5_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-636-8, 978-1-62703-637-5
Authors

Viswanathan M, Tissenbaum HA, Mohan Viswanathan, Heidi A. Tissenbaum

Abstract

The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) has four Sir2 paralogs, sir-2.1, sir-2.2, sir-2.3, and sir-2.4. Thus far, most of the research tools to study worm sirtuins have been developed for sir-2.1, due to its homology to yeast SIR2 and human SIRT1. Here, we have compiled a listing of the currently available strains (including both loss-of-function alleles and transgenics), antibodies, and RNAi constructs relevant to studies on all C. elegans sirtuin family members. We also describe the methods used in the analysis of C. elegans sirtuin function, including life span analysis, various stress-resistance assays, and fat content analysis and provide an overview of all phenotypic data relevant to C. elegans sir-2.1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 18%
Chemistry 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,228,193
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,859
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,738
of 198,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#43
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.