You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bioinformatic analysis of ESTs collected by Sanger and pyrosequencing methods for a keystone forest tree species: oak
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-11-650 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Saneyoshi Ueno, Grégoire Le Provost, Valérie Léger, Christophe Klopp, Céline Noirot, Jean-Marc Frigerio, Franck Salin, Jérôme Salse, Michael Abrouk, Florent Murat, Oliver Brendel, Jérémy Derory, Pierre Abadie, Patrick Léger, Cyril Cabane, Aurélien Barré, Antoine de Daruvar, Arnaud Couloux, Patrick Wincker, Marie-Pierre Reviron, Antoine Kremer, Christophe Plomion |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 110 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 36% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 90 | 71% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,550,598
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,632
of 10,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,414
of 181,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#32
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,697 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.