↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of vildagliptin twice daily vs. sitagliptin once daily using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): Crossover pilot study (J-VICTORIA study)

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Diabetology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of vildagliptin twice daily vs. sitagliptin once daily using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): Crossover pilot study (J-VICTORIA study)
Published in
Cardiovascular Diabetology, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2840-11-92
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masaya Sakamoto, Rimei Nishimura, Taiga Irako, Daisuke Tsujino, Kiyotaka Ando, Kazunori Utsunomiya

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
Russia 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 89 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 15 16%
Other 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 22 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 25 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#671
of 1,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,281
of 182,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.