You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative analysis of the time-dependent functional and molecular changes in spinal cord degeneration induced by the G93A SOD1 gene mutation and by mechanical compression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-9-500 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Malaspina, Natasa Jokic, Wenlong L Huang, John V Priestley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 24% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,907
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,882
of 103,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#29
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.