You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the potential of a novel oral lesion exudate collection method coupled with mass spectrometry-based proteomics for oral cancer biomarker discovery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Proteomics, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1559-0275-8-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joel A Kooren, Nelson L Rhodus, Chuanning Tang, Pratik D Jagtap, Bryan J Horrigan, Timothy J Griffin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 34% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 16% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,760,027
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Proteomics
#55
of 285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,354
of 126,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Proteomics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them