↓ Skip to main content


Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autoimmune Diseases, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

1 patent


41 Dimensions

Readers on

9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Published in
Journal of Autoimmune Diseases, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/1740-2557-2-8
Pubmed ID

Sharad Purohit, Robert Podolsky, Christin Collins, Weipeng Zheng, Desmond Schatz, Andy Muir, Diane Hopkins, Yi-Hua Huang, Jin-Xiong She

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Master 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2012.
All research outputs
of 12,463,399 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autoimmune Diseases
of 9 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 272,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autoimmune Diseases
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,463,399 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one scored the same or higher as 5 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them