↓ Skip to main content

The application of adjuvant autologous antravesical macrophage cell therapy vs. BCG in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter, randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The application of adjuvant autologous antravesical macrophage cell therapy vs. BCG in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter, randomized trial
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-8-54
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maximilian Burger, Nicolas Thiounn, Stefan Denzinger, Jozsef Kondas, Gerard Benoit, Manuel S Chapado, Fernando J Jimenz-Cruz, Laszlo Kisbenedek, Zoltán Szabo, Domján Zsolt, Marc O Grimm, Imre Romics, Joachim W Thüroff, Tamas Kiss, Bertrand Tombal, Manfred Wirth, Marc Munsell, Bonnie Mills, Tung Koh, Jeff Sherman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 43 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 26%
Student > Master 8 17%
Other 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,551,483
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,252
of 4,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,415
of 96,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.