| Title |
Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.1400005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aaron Clauset, Samuel Arbesman, Daniel B. Larremore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,097 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1068 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 159 | 5% |
| Canada | 113 | 4% |
| Germany | 58 | 2% |
| India | 52 | 2% |
| Australia | 48 | 2% |
| France | 36 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 36 | 1% |
| Spain | 31 | 1% |
| Other | 355 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1141 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1576 | 51% |
| Scientists | 1382 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 86 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 46 | 1% |
| Unknown | 7 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 753 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 709 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 206 | 27% |
| Researcher | 118 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 53 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 7% |
| Other | 157 | 21% |
| Unknown | 103 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 128 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 72 | 10% |
| Engineering | 58 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 7% |
| Psychology | 38 | 5% |
| Other | 267 | 35% |
| Unknown | 138 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2087. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,365
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#59
of 12,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29
of 369,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.