Whole-body vibration therapy in children with severe motor disabilities.
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, January 2015
Kilebrant S, Braathen G, Emilsson R, Glansén U, Söderpalm AC, Zetterlund B, Westerberg B, Magnusson P, Swolin-Eide D, S Kilebrant, G Braathen, R Emilsson, U GlansÃ©n, A SÃ¶derpalm, B Zetterlund, B Westerberg, P Magnusson, D Swolin-Eide
Objective: To study the effect of whole-body vibration therapy on bone mass, bone turnover and body composition in severely disabled children. Methods: Nineteen non-ambulatory children aged 5.1-16.3 years (6 males, 13 females) with severe motor disabilities participated in an intervention programme with standing exercise on a self-controlled dynamic platform, which included whole-body vibration therapy (vibration, jump and rotation movements). Whole-body vibration therapy was performed at 40-42 Hz, with an oscillation amplitude of 0.2 mm, 5-15 min/treatment, twice/week for 6 months. Bone mass parameters and bone markers were measured at the study start, and after 6 and 12 months. Results: Whole-body vibration therapy was appreciated by the children. Total-body bone mineral density increased during the study period (p < 0.05). Z-scores for total-body bone mineral density ranged from -5.10 to -0.60 at study start and remained unchanged throughout. Approximately 50% of the subjects had increased levels of carboxy-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen and decreased levels of osteocalcin at the start. Body mass index did not change during the intervention period, but had increased by the 12-month follow-up (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Whole-body vibration therapy appeared to be well tolerated by children with severe motor disabilities. Total-body bone mineral density increased after 6 months of whole-body vibration therapy. Higher carboxy-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen and lower osteocalcin values indicated that severely disabled children have a reduced capacity for bone acquisition.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||2||67%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||2||67%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||33%|