↓ Skip to main content

Australia’s protected area network fails to adequately protect the world’s most threatened marine fishes

Overview of attention for article published in Global Ecology and Conservation, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Australia’s protected area network fails to adequately protect the world’s most threatened marine fishes
Published in
Global Ecology and Conservation, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2015.01.007
Authors

Karen R. Devitt, Vanessa M. Adams, Peter M. Kyne

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Jersey 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 58 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Other 8 13%
Researcher 6 10%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 43%
Environmental Science 21 34%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 6 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,595,998
of 20,543,859 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology and Conservation
#267
of 1,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,681
of 318,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology and Conservation
#19
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,543,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.