↓ Skip to main content

How do people edit light fields?

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How do people edit light fields?
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2014
DOI 10.1145/2601097.2601125
Authors

Adrian Jarabo, Belen Masia, Adrien Bousseau, Fabio Pellacini, Diego Gutierrez

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 5%
Sweden 1 2%
Hong Kong 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 58 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 36%
Researcher 16 24%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 50 76%
Engineering 11 17%
Mathematics 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,774,992
of 14,579,694 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#293
of 1,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,940
of 276,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,579,694 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them