Plausibility of Menstrual Cycle Apps Claiming to Support Conception

@easterworshiper @debbiepalm44 @ImNotASkeleton2 @Perdnoot @questions_faith @PILiberal2 @God2Evolution @davidjdennison1 @Wolfpak561 @zypisfy @mikenedie @MoneeStorm @tklforgiven @zafarmir6 @AprilLigeia @imkimaaron @Dylon59556561 @TheophilusPrime @maozedong98

@sethgambee @imkimaaron @Nahdya777 @SwettmanF @JulieAMcLean @NaturalBAtheist @Chortling_Man @wpcguy @PaulaPopples @Shannon27765244 @JustSayingWhat1 @rjmx @HighPope_Brun @RandeRev @garym9999 @Rev11_5 @AmericanAtheis6 @JohnDeMelas @deadpoolrlz96 @dadebiluno

The emergence of cycle apps has been a double-edged sword for the dissemination of the method: more women can access them but with less clarity than ever. Highly recommend to any woman considering using an app reading the recent Frank-Herrmann study https:

RT @Bl00dyHealth: In contrast, the developers argue that the app has been certified. However, the certification they are relying on, from a…