↓ Skip to main content

Avoiding inconsistencies over time and tracking difficulties in Applied Biosystems AB1700™/Panther™ probe-to-gene annotations

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Avoiding inconsistencies over time and tracking difficulties in Applied Biosystems AB1700™/Panther™ probe-to-gene annotations
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, December 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-6-307
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Noth, Arndt Benecke, systems epigenomics group

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 12%
United States 1 6%
Spain 1 6%
Unknown 13 76%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 47%
Other 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 24%
Computer Science 3 18%
Mathematics 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2013.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,041
of 7,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,165
of 154,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#11
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.