↓ Skip to main content

Gaussian Process Segmentation of Co-Moving Animals

Overview of attention for article published in ADS, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gaussian Process Segmentation of Co-Moving Animals
Published in
ADS, January 2011
DOI 10.1063/1.3573650
Authors

Reece, Steven, Mann, Richard, Rezek, Iead, Roberts, Stephen, Mohammad-Djafari, Ali, Bercher, Jean-François, Bessiére, Pierre

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Computer Science 1 14%
Physics and Astronomy 1 14%
Mathematics 1 14%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2013.
All research outputs
#4,011,131
of 13,457,872 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#5,901
of 24,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,755
of 271,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#32
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,457,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.