↓ Skip to main content

Gaussian Process Segmentation of Co‐Moving Animals

Overview of attention for article published in AIP Conference Proceedings, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gaussian Process Segmentation of Co‐Moving Animals
Published in
AIP Conference Proceedings, March 2011
DOI 10.1063/1.3573650
Authors

Steven Reece, Richard Mann, Iead Rezek, Stephen Roberts, Ali Mohammad-Djafari, Jean-François Bercher, Pierre Bessiére

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 50%
Computer Science 1 13%
Physics and Astronomy 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2013.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from AIP Conference Proceedings
#839
of 8,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,968
of 119,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIP Conference Proceedings
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,371 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.