↓ Skip to main content

Identification and Validation of miRNAs as Endogenous Controls for RQ-PCR in Blood Specimens for Breast Cancer Studies

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification and Validation of miRNAs as Endogenous Controls for RQ-PCR in Blood Specimens for Breast Cancer Studies
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0083718
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ailbhe M. McDermott, Michael J. Kerin, Nicola Miller

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 25%
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 12 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,552,390
of 9,553,895 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#43,095
of 124,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,654
of 101,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#464
of 1,210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,553,895 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 57th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.