↓ Skip to main content

Continuous venovenous hemofiltration in severely burned patients with acute kidney injury: a cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous venovenous hemofiltration in severely burned patients with acute kidney injury: a cohort study
Published in
Critical Care, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/cc7801
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin K Chung, Jonathan B Lundy, James R Matson, Evan M Renz, Christopher E White, Booker T King, David J Barillo, John A Jones, Leopoldo C Cancio, Lorne H Blackbourne, Steven E Wolf

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 74 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Postgraduate 10 13%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 23 30%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 61%
Psychology 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2013.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,470
of 6,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,931
of 108,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#11
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.