↓ Skip to main content

Comparative analysis of processed ribosomal protein pseudogenes in four mammalian genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative analysis of processed ribosomal protein pseudogenes in four mammalian genomes
Published in
Genome Biology, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/gb-2009-10-1-r2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suganthi Balasubramanian, Deyou Zheng, Yuen-Jong Liu, Gang Fang, Adam Frankish, Nicholas Carriero, Rebecca Robilotto, Philip Cayting, Mark Gerstein

Abstract

The availability of genome sequences of numerous organisms allows comparative study of pseudogenes in syntenic regions. Conservation of pseudogenes suggests that they might have a functional role in some instances.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Germany 3 3%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 89 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 24%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 29%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 15 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2009.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,489
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,695
of 183,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.