↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, January 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-6-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huaibi Zhang, Lei Wang, Simon Deroles, Raymond Bennett, Kevin Davies

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
India 1 1%
China 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 66 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 31%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Chemistry 4 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 11 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2009.
All research outputs
#3,591,737
of 12,410,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#337
of 1,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,945
of 274,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,410,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,566 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them