↓ Skip to main content

Individual freedom versus collective responsibility: an economic epidemiology perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Individual freedom versus collective responsibility: an economic epidemiology perspective
Published in
Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, September 2006
DOI 10.1186/1742-7622-3-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Zia Sadique

Abstract

Individuals' free choices in vaccination do not guarantee social optimum since individuals' decision is based on imperfect information, and vaccination decision involves positive externality. Public policy of compulsory vaccination or subsidised vaccination aims to increase aggregate private demand closer to social optimum. However, there is controversy over the effectiveness of public intervention compared to the free choice outcome in vaccination, and this article provides a brief discussion on this issue. It can be summarised that individuals' incentives to vaccination and accordingly their behavioural responses can greatly influence public policy's pursuit to control disease transmission, and compulsory (or subsidised) vaccination policy without incorporating such behavioural responses will not be able to achieve the best social outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Lebanon 1 3%
Unknown 35 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 28%
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 15%
Social Sciences 6 15%
Psychology 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,949,679
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
#66
of 145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,381
of 67,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.