↓ Skip to main content

Effects of polymerase, template dilution and cycle number on PCR based 16 S rRNA diversity analysis using the deep sequencing method

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of polymerase, template dilution and cycle number on PCR based 16 S rRNA diversity analysis using the deep sequencing method
Published in
BMC Microbiology, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-10-255
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin-Ya Wu, Xiao-Tao Jiang, Yun-Xia Jiang, Su-Ying Lu, Fei Zou, Hong-Wei Zhou

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 4%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 241 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 70 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 24%
Student > Master 30 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Other 11 4%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 129 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 13%
Environmental Science 20 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 4%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 40 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2012.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#869
of 3,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,487
of 99,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,214 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.