The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Optimization of ultrasound extraction condition of phospholipids from palm-pressed fiber
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Food Engineering, June 2009
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.12.013 |
Authors |
Seong Chea Chua, Chin Ping Tan, Hamed Mirhosseini, Oi Ming Lai, Kamariah Long, Badlishah Sham Baharin |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
Researcher | 7 | 9% |
Professor | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 20% |
Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 28% |
Engineering | 16 | 20% |
Chemical Engineering | 6 | 8% |
Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Food Engineering
#507
of 1,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,097
of 125,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Food Engineering
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,816 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.