You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The 2002 Denali Fault Earthquake, Alaska: A Large Magnitude, Slip-Partitioned Event
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, May 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.1082703 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donna Eberhart-Phillips, Peter J. Haeussler, Jeffrey T. Freymueller, Arthur D. Frankel, Charles M. Rubin, Patricia Craw, Natalia A. Ratchkovski, Greg Anderson, Gary A. Carver, Anthony J. Crone, Timothy E. Dawson, Hilary Fletcher, Roger Hansen, Edwin L. Harp, Ruth A. Harris, David P. Hill, Sigrún Hreinsdóttir, Randall W. Jibson, Lucile M. Jones, Robert Kayen, David K. Keefer, Christopher F. Larsen, Seth C. Moran, Stephen F. Personius, George Plafker, Brian Sherrod, Kerry Sieh, Nicholas Sitar, Wesley K. Wallace |
| Abstract |
The MW (moment magnitude) 7.9 Denali fault earthquake on 3 November 2002 was associated with 340 kilometers of surface rupture and was the largest strike-slip earthquake in North America in almost 150 years. It illuminates earthquake mechanics and hazards of large strike-slip faults. It began with thrusting on the previously unrecognized Susitna Glacier fault, continued with right-slip on the Denali fault, then took a right step and continued with right-slip on the Totschunda fault. There is good correlation between geologically observed and geophysically inferred moment release. The earthquake produced unusually strong distal effects in the rupture propagation direction, including triggered seismicity. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Panama | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 154 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 27% |
| Researcher | 39 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 111 | 66% |
| Engineering | 9 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,873,299
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from Science
#36,720
of 78,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,049
of 51,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#119
of 313 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 313 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.