↓ Skip to main content

Prostate cancer detection at rebiopsy after an initial benign diagnosis: results using sextant extended prostate biopsy

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 115)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prostate cancer detection at rebiopsy after an initial benign diagnosis: results using sextant extended prostate biopsy
Published in
Clinics, January 2008
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322008000300009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katia Ramos Moreira Leite, Luiz Heraldo Camara-Lopes, José Cury, Marcos F. Dall'Oglio, Adriana Sañudo, Miguel Srougi, Luiz Heraldo Camara‐Lopes, Marcos F. Dall’Oglio

Abstract

Sextant prostate biopsy remains the standard technique for the detection of prostate cancer. It is well known that after a diagnosis of small acinar proliferation (ASAP) or high grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), the possibility of finding cancer is approximately 40% and 30%, respectively.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Computer Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 55%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2008.
All research outputs
#1,120,613
of 4,655,094 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#16
of 115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,914
of 164,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,655,094 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them