↓ Skip to main content

Plant Cold Acclimation

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Plant Cold Acclimation'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Introduction: Plant Cold Acclimation and Freezing Tolerance
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Measuring Freezing Tolerance: Survival and Regrowth Assays
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Measuring Freezing Tolerance: Electrolyte Leakage and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Assays
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Conducting Field Trials for Frost Tolerance Breeding in Cereals
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 A Whole-Plant Screening Test to Identify Genotypes with Superior Freezing Tolerance
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Associated with Plant Freezing Tolerance and Cold Acclimation
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Common garden experiments to characterize cold acclimation responses in plants from different climatic regions.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Identification of Arabidopsis Mutants with Altered Freezing Tolerance
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Infrared Thermal Analysis of Plant Freezing Processes
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Cryo-Scanning Electron Microscopy to Study the Freezing Behavior of Plant Tissues
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Frozen and Thawed Plant Tissues from Microscopic Images
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Proteomic Approaches to Identify Cold-Regulated Soluble Proteins
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Proteomic Approaches to Identify Cold-Regulated Plasma Membrane Proteins
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Profiling Methods to Identify Cold-Regulated Primary Metabolites Using Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 A Lipidomic Approach to Identify Cold-Induced Changes in Arabidopsis Membrane Lipid Composition
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Quantification of Superoxide and Hydrogen Peroxide in Leaves
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Estimating Ice Encasement Tolerance of Herbage Plants
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Plant Cold Acclimation
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Isolation and Characterization of Ice-Binding Proteins from Higher Plants
Attention for Chapter 7: Common garden experiments to characterize cold acclimation responses in plants from different climatic regions.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Common garden experiments to characterize cold acclimation responses in plants from different climatic regions.
Chapter number 7
Book title
Plant Cold Acclimation
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0844-8_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-0843-1, 978-1-4939-0844-8
Authors

Malyshev AV, Henry HA, Kreyling J, Andrey V. Malyshev, Hugh A. L. Henry, Juergen Kreyling

Abstract

Cold acclimation is a crucial factor to consider in the context of ongoing climate change. Maladaptation with regard to frost damage and use of the growing season may occur depending on cold acclimation cues. Importance of photoperiod and preceding temperatures as cues needs therefore to be evaluated within (ecotypes) and among species. Common garden designs, in particular the (1) establishment of multiple common gardens along latitudinal/altitudinal gradients, (2) with in situ additional climate manipulations and (3) with manipulations in climate chambers are proposed as tools for the detection of local adaptations and relative importance of temperature and photoperiod as cues for cold adaptation. Here, we discuss issues in species and ecotype selection, establishment of common gardens including manipulations of temperature and photoperiod, and quantification of cold adaptation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 43%
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 29%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2014.
All research outputs
#10,227,419
of 11,527,778 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,376
of 7,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,395
of 183,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#43
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,527,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,956 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.