↓ Skip to main content

The academic tweet: Twitter as a tool to advance academic surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Surgical Research, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 3,685)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
362 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The academic tweet: Twitter as a tool to advance academic surgery
Published in
Journal of Surgical Research, June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather J. Logghe, Luke V. Selby, Marissa A. Boeck, Nikki L. Stamp, Jason Chuen, Christian Jones

Abstract

Social media, Twitter in particular, has emerged as an essential tool for surgeons. In the realm of academic surgery, it enables surgeons to advance the core values of academic surgery, as outlined by the Association for Academic Surgery: inclusion, leadership, innovation, scholarship, and mentorship. This article details the ways in which surgeons are using Twitter to embody these values and how the Twitter account for the Association of Academic Surgeons accomplishes its goal of inspiring and developing young academic surgeons.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 362 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Unspecified 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Other 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 17 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Unspecified 8 17%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Computer Science 4 9%
Other 12 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 233. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2019.
All research outputs
#55,513
of 13,644,623 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Surgical Research
#4
of 3,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,802
of 271,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Surgical Research
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,644,623 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,685 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.