↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial Molecular Networks

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Bacterial Molecular Networks'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Bacterial molecular networks: bridging the gap between functional genomics and dynamical modelling.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Bacterial Interactomes: From Interactions to Networks
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Bacterial Molecular Networks
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Prokaryote genome fluidity: toward a system approach of the mobilome.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Reticulate Classification of Mosaic Microbial Genomes Using NeAT Website
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 From Metabolic Reactions to Networks and Pathways
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Predicting Metabolic Pathways by Sub-network Extraction
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Directed Module Detection in a Large-Scale Expression Compendium
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Using Phylogenetic Profiles to Predict Functional Relationships
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Extracting Regulatory Networks of Escherichia coli from RegulonDB
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Browsing Metabolic and Regulatory Networks with BioCyc
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Algorithms for Systematic Identification of Small Subgraphs
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 The Degree Distribution of Networks: Statistical Model Selection
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 MAVisto: A Tool for Biological Network Motif Analysis
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Using MCL to Extract Clusters from Networks
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Protein Complex Prediction with RNSC
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Network Analysis and Protein Function Prediction with the PRODISTIN Web Site
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Using the NeAT Toolbox to Compare Networks to Networks, Clusters to Clusters, and Network to Clusters
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Analyzing Biological Data Using R: Methods for Graphs and Networks
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Detecting Structural Invariants in Biological Reaction Networks
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Petri Nets in Snoopy: A Unifying Framework for the Graphical Display, Computational Modelling, and Simulation of Bacterial Regulatory Networks
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Genetic Network Analyzer: A Tool for the Qualitative Modeling and Simulation of Bacterial Regulatory Networks
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Logical Modelling of Gene Regulatory Networks with GINsim.
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Modelling the Evolution of Mutualistic Symbioses
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Modelling the Onset of Virulence in Pathogenic Bacteria
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Spatial and Stochastic Cellular Modeling with the Smoldyn Simulator
Attention for Chapter 23: Logical Modelling of Gene Regulatory Networks with GINsim.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Logical Modelling of Gene Regulatory Networks with GINsim.
Chapter number 23
Book title
Bacterial Molecular Networks
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-361-5_23
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61779-360-8, 978-1-61779-361-5
Authors

Chaouiya C, Naldi A, Thieffry D, Claudine Chaouiya, Aurélien Naldi, Denis Thieffry

Abstract

Discrete mathematical formalisms are well adapted to model large biological networks, for which detailed kinetic data are scarce. This chapter introduces the reader to a well-established qualitative (logical) framework for the modelling of regulatory networks. Relying on GINsim, a software implementing this logical formalism, we guide the reader step by step towards the definition and the analysis of a simple model of the lysis-lysogeny decision in the bacteriophage λ.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 4%
Italy 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 65 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 29%
Researcher 19 27%
Student > Master 12 17%
Professor 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 16%
Computer Science 11 16%
Engineering 4 6%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 9 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2014.
All research outputs
#3,746,645
of 4,622,892 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,126
of 3,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,929
of 150,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#262
of 401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,622,892 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,298 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.