↓ Skip to main content

Mouse Models for Drug Discovery

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Mouse Models for Drug Discovery'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Improving Toxicity Screening and Drug Development by Using Genetically Defined Strains
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The Sophisticated Mouse: Protecting a Precious Reagent
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Genetically Engineered Mouse Models in Drug Discovery Research
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Engineering the Mouse Genome to Model Human Disease for Drug Discovery
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Profiling of drug action using reporter mice and molecular imaging.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Human FcRn Transgenic Mice for Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Therapeutic Antibodies
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Development of novel major histocompatibility complex class I and class II-deficient NOD-SCID IL2R gamma chain knockout mice for modeling human xenogeneic graft-versus-host disease.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Bridging Mice to Men: Using HLA Transgenic Mice to Enhance the Future Prediction and Prevention of Autoimmune Type 1 Diabetes in Humans
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Mouse Models of Type II Diabetes Mellitus in Drug Discovery
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Cholesterol Absorption and Metabolism
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Collagen-Induced Arthritis in Mice
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Skin Diseases in Laboratory Mice: Approaches to Drug Target Identification and Efficacy Screening
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Models of Metastasis in Drug Discovery
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Methods for Evaluating Effects of an Irinotecan + 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin (IFL) Regimen in an Orthotopic Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Model Utilizing In Vivo Bioluminescence Imaging
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 CML Mouse Model in Translational Research
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Mouse Models for Studying Depression-Like States and Antidepressant Drugs
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Virus-Delivered RNA Interference in Mouse Brain to Study Addiction-Related Behaviors
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Experimental Models of Anxiety for Drug Discovery and Brain Research
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Mouse Models of Neurodegenerative Diseases: Criteria and General Methodology
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Neuromuscular Disease Models and Analysis
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Murine Model of Cutaneous Infection with Streptococcus pyogenes
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Murine Model of Pneumococcal Pneumonia
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Murine Model of Polymicrobial Septic Peritonitis Using Cecal Ligation and Puncture (CLP)
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Erratum to: Human FcRn Transgenic Mice for Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Therapeutic Antibodies
Attention for Chapter 6: Human FcRn Transgenic Mice for Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Therapeutic Antibodies
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Human FcRn Transgenic Mice for Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Therapeutic Antibodies
Chapter number 6
Book title
Mouse Models for Drug Discovery
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60761-058-8_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60761-057-1, 978-1-60761-058-8
Authors

Derry C. Roopenian, Gregory J. Christianson, Thomas J. Sproule, Roopenian, Derry C., Christianson, Gregory J., Sproule, Thomas J.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 28%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Other 4 13%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,229,660
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,138
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,063
of 165,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#16
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.