↓ Skip to main content

Synthetic mRNA

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 11: Synthetic mRNA
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Synthetic mRNA
Chapter number 11
Book title
Synthetic mRNA
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3625-0_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3623-6, 978-1-4939-3625-0
Authors

Kreiter, Sebastian, Diken, Mustafa, Selmi, Abderraouf, Petschenka, Jutta, Türeci, Özlem, Sahin, Ugur, Sebastian Kreiter, Mustafa Diken, Abderraouf Selmi, Jutta Petschenka, Özlem Türeci, Ugur Sahin

Abstract

Intranodal immunization with antigen-encoding naked mRNA has proven to be an efficacious and safe approach to induce antitumor immunity. Thanks to its unique characteristics, mRNA can act not only as a source for antigen but also as an adjuvant for activation of the immune system. The search for additional adjuvants that can be combined with mRNA to further improve the potency of the immunization revealed Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) ligand as a potent candidate. Systemic administration of the dendritic cell-activating FLT3 ligand prior to or along with mRNA immunization-enhanced priming and expansion of antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells in lymphoid organs, T-cell homing into melanoma tumors, and therapeutic activity of the intranodally administered mRNA. Both compounds demonstrate a successful combination in terms of boosting the immune response. This chapter describes methods for intranodal immunization with naked mRNA by co-administration of FLT3 ligand, which leads to strong synergistic effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 6 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 10 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,951,310
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#595
of 13,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,969
of 393,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#102
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.